Monday, October 5, 2009

Loyalists and the American Revolution

Note: Um, our group kinda forgot it had to be an outline so, yeah...

Background


Many Americans were not fully supportive of the cause for independence. Referred to as Loyalists, and often jeered upon as “Tories”, these men and women remained loyal to the “mother country,” Great Britain. Loyalists tended to be British colonial officials, Anglican clergymen, lawyer, members of ethnic minorities, tenant farmers who worked for abusive Patriot landlords, slaves, American Indians, and conservatives

Reasons for Remaining Loyal

Business – Many businesses were reliant on loans and trade from/with British merchants. Unwilling to alienate the market for their goods, many business owners, such as plantation owners in the Lower South, refused to join the Patriot cause and “bite the hand that feeds them”

Persecution – Members of society who faced discrimination and persecution from those around them (who tended to be Patriots) were unwilling to side with those who had caused them so much previous distress (examples: minorities, abused tenant farmers)

Fear of Violent Political Disruptions – Many conservative men and women were fearful of the possibility of violent revolts and mob gatherings that would occur as a result of political distress amongst Patriots

“Children Rebelling Against Their Mothers” – Many Americans refused to fall into the squabble that was occurring between Great Britain (the mother country) and the American colonies (the children). Most of these people remembered and were grateful for the actions that the British crown and Parliament and performed for them only a few decades before (example: providing funding for the exploration of the New World, which as a result led to the establishment of the colonies)

Impact on Revolution

The Loyalists both in America and in Great Britain had major and minor impacts on the conflict in the colonial area. Some issues that arose because of Loyalists in Colonial America were that they were often the center of attacks and people would yell angry remarks at them. The loyalists even developed the nickname "Tories" as a derogatory nickname. The loyalists in Colonial America mostly remained secretive to avoid conflict and discrimination. They never really attempted any political organization. They were only militarily active in places under British control, predominantly in the South. They did not have a huge impact in America. But in Great Britain, mostly everyone remained loyalists because of their location and say in Parliament.

British officials were almost always Loyalists, but some disagreed with what they were doing, particularly later in the war. But they thought it was necessary to obey their king. The main impact was conflict and discrimination between the Patriots and the Loyalists.

Revolution Impact on Loyalist Lives

Hostility—During the war, Patriots seized all royal territories and made it treason to declare loyalty to the King. Much Loyalist property was either destroyed or confiscated. Most of it was never given back or recompensated for, although Britain made Americans have promises to do so in the Treaty of Paris. In addition to losing property, Loyalists could also suffer public humiliation with threats of tarring and feathering, slandering in newspapers, and physical attack. Two Philadelphia residents were executed for actively aiding the British during the city’s occupation, but this is an extreme case. In short, the Patriots did all they could to discourage Loyalists from taking up armed resistance.

Emigration—Though the vast majority of Loyalists stayed where they were, an estimated 10-20% left for the other British territories such as New Brunswick or the West Indies by the conclusion of the war. Thousands of Indians and slaves moved to Canada. The Loyalists who stayed were recognized as citizens of a new country. Some became famous political figures such as Tench Coxe, a Pennsylvanian delegate and Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.

-ML, KD, RW

19 comments:

A.S. said...

In my opinion, the loyalists were rather abused during the revolution. In retrospect, they did nothing wrong; they were just people who remained loyal to their government. Any war has factions on the same side that don't agree. The attacks on the "Tories" were really unjust.

SE said...

i can see how loyalists, want to support Britain, up until recently they have lived a great life under the control of this country. But if I wee them I would be scared to live around the Patriots.

mb said...

I believe that the Patriots were just very supportive of their belief and were trying to get loyalists to join. I don't believe that loyalists should have been living in America if they didn't want independence. How could they think that a completely different section of the world thousands of miles away could be the same country. It would be almost impossible in this time period for it to be successful.

VL said...

I feel like the treatment of the Loyalists was unfair and too cruel. The Americans were fighting fo rwhat they believed in, so they should be considerate of the others opinions as well. Many of the reasons that the Loyalists had for opposing the Patriots made sense. Many of these reasons resulted in negative effects, which would only seem reasonable for the Loyalists to try and avoid.

Az said...

(MY OPINION): the Americans felt they deserved justice and freedom, but were they giving the other loyalist colonists justice and freedom? no..... I kind of thought that was hypcritical. They treated other loyalist colonists poorly just because they did not support the patriotic cause.

Its interesting how time can change the way people think. Take war for example today, there are many people who oppose the war for various reasons, yet we don't go around calling them names or threatening to deport, or persecute or act violently toward them or such things. We (for the most part...) respect their right of speech and idea and thought, which is protected under the first amendment. (I don't know, i thought that was kind of interesting)

SS said...

The abuse and hostility the Loyalists in America had to face seems extreme and unfair. I can understand why some colonists would have remained loyal to the crown; the reasons are pretty valid. For the most part though, Loyalists had a small impact in the war efforts and avoided conflict, and so Patriots shouldn't have treated them so harshly. In some cases, Loyalists were not the enemy, but simply fellow colonists with differing views and beliefs. I think Patriots took out their hatred towards the British on the Loyalists, as unfair as this may be. It's awful that Loyalists had to endure so much discrimination and hostility.

Anonymous said...

I think that the loyalists were treated fairly in the Revolution. They could have left if they felt they wanted to stay loyal to the crown. You have to take into consideration that the loyalists in America were fighting their patriotic neighbors, so they obviously held no sympathy in hindering the colonists. This is just my opinion

S.P. said...

Loyalists should've just left and found a new area to live, or just keep their mouth shut. It was safer for them that way, as they would avoid conflict with patriots. They could've also not gotten in trouble if britain had won the war. Saying your mind is not smart when someone is willing to kill you for it.

Anonymous said...

While I can understand that these Loyalists were opposed to the war (various reasons for them to do so), it was politically dangerous for them to express such dissent.

I'm not sure why anyone would openly declare this sort of thing when they were surrounded by a population about ~60% supportive of the Patriots. And since the Patriots took over local government and made examples out of Loyalists, I'm sure that shut some others up.

Mr. Hamilton said...

Your format is just fine.

OD said...

I feel that the loyalist were good in principle but really needed to open their eyes to the world around them. Sure supporting your country was a great thing if the country was kind to you. But Britain massacred your own people and pushed harsh taxes on you population. Also the fact that almost the rest of the nation hated you for your ideals. At least they diddnt need to be public ally announced loyalists.

RL said...

Loyalists were seen as a threat to the unity of the colonies. If there was too much dissent, if they voiced their opinions or took up arms, it could easily lose america the war. Though of course their actions were somewhat rash, they were faced with losing their country. If we lose in Afghanistan or Iraq, there is little chance the Taliban or Al-Quaeda will completely CONQUER the US. Ergo there is not as much pressure to keep us unified.

CC said...

I think its almost respectable and brave for Loyalists to have lived in the colonies. When you think about it they really did nothing wrong...they were loyal to their government respecting the wishes of authorities. I think it was brave of them to live surrounded by Patriots who were wild, passionate, and dangerous. I think treatment of the Loyalists was unfair.

KK said...

I agree with A.S. that loyalists were abused. They were people with different beliefs than the patriots, and they were criticized for staying loyal to the motherland. Many were threatened by the loyalists and were forced to leave.

JH said...

Before i thought that what happened with the colonies were just normal but i didn't realize exactly how radical patriots were in tearing away from England. the loyalist wanted to life politically and overall to stay the same as it was for it seemed fit for them. The attacks upon them were brutal and unfair as it is clear now. Loyalists were discriminated and looked down upon because of what they believed which is not right. It is one thing to think something different but another to punish those because of what they stand for.

SE said...

It may only be my view, but I feel that Loyalists had a right to choose which side they fought on. Was it truly treason against their nation of America, or simply being loyal to the country that had ruled them for years. Still, a war is a war, and they fought for the British and/or were attacked by Patriots. Still, all of the wrongs done to them should have been undone after the war was over.

S.H. said...

The Americans were fighting to break away from Britain, not necessarily for the right of freedom of speech; they just wanted equal representation and fair laws. I don't see how the Americans would be hypocritical. However, I do believe that the Loyalists were treated badly, but one must keep in mind that not only did the Patriots attack Loyalists but the Loyalists attacked the Patriots. There were many violent skirmishes in the South--arson, murder, etc.

It did surprise me that there were "Sedition Acts" during the Revolutionary War like in WWI.

SD said...

I can understand how conservatives would want to stay with Britain and not fight for independence. They still loved their mother country and didn't want to fight a war that might jeopardize their freedom as citizens in Britain. Loyalists weren't doing anything wrong, they were just standing up for their beliefs, even though they might have been cowardly or unpopular.

GS said...

I find it strange that the loyalists did not think of the negative effects of remaining loyal. Unlike the people declaring independence they only focused on the negative concequences of joining the war. As you see in the 1st and 2nd Continental Congress, the threats of losing were strongly welcomed. The loyalists were not aware of the mistreatment that would occur after the United States wins the war and their freedom.